Reason for request
Indication extension
Key points
Favourable opinion for reimbursement of KEYTRUDA in combination with lenvatinib for the first-line treatment of adult patients with advanced clear-cell renal cell carcinoma only.
Unfavourable opinion for reimbursement of KEYTRUDA in combination with lenvatinib in the other situations covered by the MA indication.
Clinical Benefit
| Substantial |
The Committee deems that the clinical benefit of KEYTRUDA 25 mg/ml (pembrolizumab) in combination with lenvatinib is substantial in the first-line treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma, only in clear-cell RCC or with a clear-cell component;
|
| Insufficient |
The Committee deems that the clinical benefit of KEYTRUDA 25 mg/ml (pembrolizumab) in combination with lenvatinib is insufficient to justify public funding in the first-line treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma with a histological type other than clear-cell given the absence of robust data.
|
Clinical Added Value
| moderate |
Considering:
- evidence of the superiority of the KEYTRUDA (pembrolizumab) + lenvatinib combination compared to sunitinib, considered to be an acceptable comparator at the time of implementation of the KEYNOTE-581 (CLEAR) study, for:
- progression-free survival assessed by an independent review committee (primary efficacy endpoint): 23.9 months versus median of 9.2 months; HR = 0.39; 95% CI [0.32; 0.49]; p<0.0001,
- overall survival (ranked secondary endpoint): the median was not reached in either of the two groups; HR=0.66; 95% CI [0.49; 0.88]; p=0.0049,
despite:
- an additional toxicity of this combination compared to sunitinib, particularly in terms of serious adverse events (50.6% vs 33.2%), grade ≥ 3 events (82.4% vs 71.8%) or events leading to discontinuation of treatment (37.4% vs 14.4%),
- exploratory quality of life data,
the Transparency Committee considers that the KEYTRUDA (pembrolizumab) + lenvatinib combination, like the pembrolizumab/axitinib combination and the nivolumab/cabozantinib combination, provides a moderate clinical added value (CAV III) compared to sunitinib in the first-line treatment of advanced clear-cell renal cell carcinoma or with a clear-cell component.
|
| Not applicable |
|
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
Pd74s0vy22HjfSdP