Reason for request
Indication extension
Key points
Favourable opinion for reimbursement of KEYTRUDA in combination with lenvatinib for the first-line treatment of adult patients with advanced clear-cell renal cell carcinoma only.
Unfavourable opinion for reimbursement of KEYTRUDA in combination with lenvatinib in the other situations covered by the MA indication.
Clinical Benefit
| Substantial |
The Committee deems that the clinical benefit of KEYTRUDA 25 mg/ml (pembrolizumab) in combination with lenvatinib is substantial in the first-line treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma, only in clear-cell RCC or with a clear-cell component;
|
| Insufficient |
The Committee deems that the clinical benefit of KEYTRUDA 25 mg/ml (pembrolizumab) in combination with lenvatinib is insufficient to justify public funding in the first-line treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma with a histological type other than clear-cell given the absence of robust data.
|
Clinical Added Value
| moderate |
Considering:
- evidence of the superiority of the KEYTRUDA (pembrolizumab) + lenvatinib combination compared to sunitinib, considered to be an acceptable comparator at the time of implementation of the KEYNOTE-581 (CLEAR) study, for:
- progression-free survival assessed by an independent review committee (primary efficacy endpoint): 23.9 months versus median of 9.2 months; HR = 0.39; 95% CI [0.32; 0.49]; p<0.0001,
- overall survival (ranked secondary endpoint): the median was not reached in either of the two groups; HR=0.66; 95% CI [0.49; 0.88]; p=0.0049,
despite:
- an additional toxicity of this combination compared to sunitinib, particularly in terms of serious adverse events (50.6% vs 33.2%), grade ≥ 3 events (82.4% vs 71.8%) or events leading to discontinuation of treatment (37.4% vs 14.4%),
- exploratory quality of life data,
the Transparency Committee considers that the KEYTRUDA (pembrolizumab) + lenvatinib combination, like the pembrolizumab/axitinib combination and the nivolumab/cabozantinib combination, provides a moderate clinical added value (CAV III) compared to sunitinib in the first-line treatment of advanced clear-cell renal cell carcinoma or with a clear-cell component.
|
| Not applicable |
|
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
EpxMCTrnDCrC3bT8