Reason for request
Indication extension
Key points
Favourable opinion for reimbursement of KEYTRUDA in combination with lenvatinib for the first-line treatment of adult patients with advanced clear-cell renal cell carcinoma only.
Unfavourable opinion for reimbursement of KEYTRUDA in combination with lenvatinib in the other situations covered by the MA indication.
Clinical Benefit
| Substantial |
The Committee deems that the clinical benefit of KEYTRUDA 25 mg/ml (pembrolizumab) in combination with lenvatinib is substantial in the first-line treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma, only in clear-cell RCC or with a clear-cell component;
|
| Insufficient |
The Committee deems that the clinical benefit of KEYTRUDA 25 mg/ml (pembrolizumab) in combination with lenvatinib is insufficient to justify public funding in the first-line treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma with a histological type other than clear-cell given the absence of robust data.
|
Clinical Added Value
| moderate |
Considering:
- evidence of the superiority of the KEYTRUDA (pembrolizumab) + lenvatinib combination compared to sunitinib, considered to be an acceptable comparator at the time of implementation of the KEYNOTE-581 (CLEAR) study, for:
- progression-free survival assessed by an independent review committee (primary efficacy endpoint): 23.9 months versus median of 9.2 months; HR = 0.39; 95% CI [0.32; 0.49]; p<0.0001,
- overall survival (ranked secondary endpoint): the median was not reached in either of the two groups; HR=0.66; 95% CI [0.49; 0.88]; p=0.0049,
despite:
- an additional toxicity of this combination compared to sunitinib, particularly in terms of serious adverse events (50.6% vs 33.2%), grade ≥ 3 events (82.4% vs 71.8%) or events leading to discontinuation of treatment (37.4% vs 14.4%),
- exploratory quality of life data,
the Transparency Committee considers that the KEYTRUDA (pembrolizumab) + lenvatinib combination, like the pembrolizumab/axitinib combination and the nivolumab/cabozantinib combination, provides a moderate clinical added value (CAV III) compared to sunitinib in the first-line treatment of advanced clear-cell renal cell carcinoma or with a clear-cell component.
|
| Not applicable |
|
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
0seBep08FyVTbkfu