Reason for request
Indication extension
Key points
Favourable opinion for reimbursement of KEYTRUDA in combination with lenvatinib for the first-line treatment of adult patients with advanced clear-cell renal cell carcinoma only.
Unfavourable opinion for reimbursement of KEYTRUDA in combination with lenvatinib in the other situations covered by the MA indication.
Clinical Benefit
| Substantial |
The Committee deems that the clinical benefit of KEYTRUDA 25 mg/ml (pembrolizumab) in combination with lenvatinib is substantial in the first-line treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma, only in clear-cell RCC or with a clear-cell component;
|
| Insufficient |
The Committee deems that the clinical benefit of KEYTRUDA 25 mg/ml (pembrolizumab) in combination with lenvatinib is insufficient to justify public funding in the first-line treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma with a histological type other than clear-cell given the absence of robust data.
|
Clinical Added Value
| moderate |
Considering:
- evidence of the superiority of the KEYTRUDA (pembrolizumab) + lenvatinib combination compared to sunitinib, considered to be an acceptable comparator at the time of implementation of the KEYNOTE-581 (CLEAR) study, for:
- progression-free survival assessed by an independent review committee (primary efficacy endpoint): 23.9 months versus median of 9.2 months; HR = 0.39; 95% CI [0.32; 0.49]; p<0.0001,
- overall survival (ranked secondary endpoint): the median was not reached in either of the two groups; HR=0.66; 95% CI [0.49; 0.88]; p=0.0049,
despite:
- an additional toxicity of this combination compared to sunitinib, particularly in terms of serious adverse events (50.6% vs 33.2%), grade ≥ 3 events (82.4% vs 71.8%) or events leading to discontinuation of treatment (37.4% vs 14.4%),
- exploratory quality of life data,
the Transparency Committee considers that the KEYTRUDA (pembrolizumab) + lenvatinib combination, like the pembrolizumab/axitinib combination and the nivolumab/cabozantinib combination, provides a moderate clinical added value (CAV III) compared to sunitinib in the first-line treatment of advanced clear-cell renal cell carcinoma or with a clear-cell component.
|
| Not applicable |
|
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
ZSwVMKM1wAHfMGBA