Reason for request
Indication extension
Key points
Favourable opinion for reimbursement of KEYTRUDA in combination with lenvatinib for the first-line treatment of adult patients with advanced clear-cell renal cell carcinoma only.
Unfavourable opinion for reimbursement of KEYTRUDA in combination with lenvatinib in the other situations covered by the MA indication.
Clinical Benefit
| Substantial |
The Committee deems that the clinical benefit of KEYTRUDA 25 mg/ml (pembrolizumab) in combination with lenvatinib is substantial in the first-line treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma, only in clear-cell RCC or with a clear-cell component;
|
| Insufficient |
The Committee deems that the clinical benefit of KEYTRUDA 25 mg/ml (pembrolizumab) in combination with lenvatinib is insufficient to justify public funding in the first-line treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma with a histological type other than clear-cell given the absence of robust data.
|
Clinical Added Value
| moderate |
Considering:
- evidence of the superiority of the KEYTRUDA (pembrolizumab) + lenvatinib combination compared to sunitinib, considered to be an acceptable comparator at the time of implementation of the KEYNOTE-581 (CLEAR) study, for:
- progression-free survival assessed by an independent review committee (primary efficacy endpoint): 23.9 months versus median of 9.2 months; HR = 0.39; 95% CI [0.32; 0.49]; p<0.0001,
- overall survival (ranked secondary endpoint): the median was not reached in either of the two groups; HR=0.66; 95% CI [0.49; 0.88]; p=0.0049,
despite:
- an additional toxicity of this combination compared to sunitinib, particularly in terms of serious adverse events (50.6% vs 33.2%), grade ≥ 3 events (82.4% vs 71.8%) or events leading to discontinuation of treatment (37.4% vs 14.4%),
- exploratory quality of life data,
the Transparency Committee considers that the KEYTRUDA (pembrolizumab) + lenvatinib combination, like the pembrolizumab/axitinib combination and the nivolumab/cabozantinib combination, provides a moderate clinical added value (CAV III) compared to sunitinib in the first-line treatment of advanced clear-cell renal cell carcinoma or with a clear-cell component.
|
| Not applicable |
|
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
prdbUgZv5vN4Zkwv