Reason for request
Indication extension
Key points
Favourable opinion for reimbursement of KEYTRUDA in combination with lenvatinib for the first-line treatment of adult patients with advanced clear-cell renal cell carcinoma only.
Unfavourable opinion for reimbursement of KEYTRUDA in combination with lenvatinib in the other situations covered by the MA indication.
Clinical Benefit
| Substantial |
The Committee deems that the clinical benefit of KEYTRUDA 25 mg/ml (pembrolizumab) in combination with lenvatinib is substantial in the first-line treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma, only in clear-cell RCC or with a clear-cell component;
|
| Insufficient |
The Committee deems that the clinical benefit of KEYTRUDA 25 mg/ml (pembrolizumab) in combination with lenvatinib is insufficient to justify public funding in the first-line treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma with a histological type other than clear-cell given the absence of robust data.
|
Clinical Added Value
| moderate |
Considering:
- evidence of the superiority of the KEYTRUDA (pembrolizumab) + lenvatinib combination compared to sunitinib, considered to be an acceptable comparator at the time of implementation of the KEYNOTE-581 (CLEAR) study, for:
- progression-free survival assessed by an independent review committee (primary efficacy endpoint): 23.9 months versus median of 9.2 months; HR = 0.39; 95% CI [0.32; 0.49]; p<0.0001,
- overall survival (ranked secondary endpoint): the median was not reached in either of the two groups; HR=0.66; 95% CI [0.49; 0.88]; p=0.0049,
despite:
- an additional toxicity of this combination compared to sunitinib, particularly in terms of serious adverse events (50.6% vs 33.2%), grade ≥ 3 events (82.4% vs 71.8%) or events leading to discontinuation of treatment (37.4% vs 14.4%),
- exploratory quality of life data,
the Transparency Committee considers that the KEYTRUDA (pembrolizumab) + lenvatinib combination, like the pembrolizumab/axitinib combination and the nivolumab/cabozantinib combination, provides a moderate clinical added value (CAV III) compared to sunitinib in the first-line treatment of advanced clear-cell renal cell carcinoma or with a clear-cell component.
|
| Not applicable |
|
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
LdKHT979cEv8W5dh