TREMFYA (guselkumab) - Crohn’s disease
Reason for request
Summary of opinion
Favourable opinion for reimbursement only in “the treatment of adult patients with moderately to severely active Crohn's disease who have had an inadequate response to, lost response to, or were intolerant to conventional therapy (corticosteroids or immuno-
suppressants) and at least one anti-TNF agent, or who have a medical contraindication to these treatments”.
Unfavourable opinion for reimbursement in the other situations covered by the MA indication.
Clinical Benefit
| Substantial |
The clinical benefit of TREMFYA (guselkumab) is substantial only in the treatment of adult patients with moderately to severely active Crohn's disease who have had an inadequate response to, lost response to, or were intolerant to conventional therapy (corticosteroids or immunosuppressants) and at least one anti-TNF agent, or who have a medical contraindication to these treatments.
|
| Insufficient |
The clinical benefit of TREMFYA (guselkumab) is insufficient to justify public funding in view of the available alternatives in the other MA situations.
|
Clinical Added Value
| no clinical added value |
Considering:
the Committee deems that TREMFYA (guselkumab) provides no clinical added value (CAV V) compared to ustekinumab (STELARA) at an optimised dosage (SC injection every 8 weeks) in the treatment of adult patients with moderately to severely active Crohn's disease who have had an inadequate response to, lost response to, or were intolerant to conventional therapy (corticosteroids or immunosuppressants) and at least one anti-TNFα agent, or who have a medical contraindication to these treatments. |
| Not applicable |
