Reason for request

Reevaluation

  • Key points

Favourable opinion for maintenance of reimbursement in combination with dexamethasone in the treatment of adult patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma who have received at least two prior treatment regimens, including both lenalidomide and bortezomib, and have demonstrated disease progression on the last therapy.

  • What therapeutic improvement?

No clinical added value.

  • Role in the care pathway?

There is no standard treatment for the relapse or progression of multiple myeloma. The therapeutic decision depends on age, previous treatments, the duration of the first remission, the circumstances of the relapse, the availability of peripheral blood stem cells, the general health status of patients and their comorbidities. Recently, new medicinal products have been added to the therapeutic arsenal for second-line treatment, such as daratumumab (DARZALEX), ixazomib (NINLARO) or carfilzomib (KYPROLIS), combined with bortezomib (VELCADE) or lenalidomide (REVLIMID) and dexamethasone.

From the second relapse, in patients already treated with bortezomib and lenalidomide, FARYDAK (panobinostat), combined with bortezomib and dexamethasone, represents a last resort treatment option for patients with relapsed and/or refractory myeloma, who have received at least two prior treatment regimens, including bortezomib and an immunomodulatory agent. DARZALEX (daratumumab) is also an option in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma, whose prior therapy included a proteasome inhibitor and an immunomodulatory agent; however, its earlier use in the context of combinations with a proteasome inhibitor (PI) or an IMiD, substantially reduces the benefit of this monotherapy in subsequent treatment lines.

Role of the medicinal product in the care pathway

Given the evolution of the care pathway in multiple myeloma, with new medicinal products having been added to the therapeutic arsenal in earlier treatment lines, the role of IMNOVID (pomalidomide) in combination with dexamethasone has become more limited.  In addition, earlier use of IMNOVID (pomalidomide) from the second line of treatment in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone is likely to substantially reduce the benefit of pomalidomide-dexamethasone dual therapy in subsequent treatment lines. In the absence of any comparison with the other treatments now available as third-line treatment (DARZALEX (daratumumab) and FARYDAK (panobinostat)), the role of IMNOVID (pomalidomide) in combination with dexamethasone compared to these treatments is still to be defined.

 


Clinical Benefit

Substantial

The clinical benefit of IMNOVID remains substantial in the indication “in combination with dexamethasone in the treatment of adult patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma who have received at least two prior treatment regimens, including both lenalidomide and bortezomib, and have demonstrated disease progression on the last therapy.”


Clinical Added Value

no clinical added value

Considering:

  • the data available with IMNOVID in combination with dexamethasone obtained in the MM-003 pivotal trial, already assessed by the Commission, demonstrating a modest improvement in terms of efficacy, in particular on overall survival, compared to a comparator [high-dose dexamethasone], which is now no longer clinically relevant,
  • new efficacy and safety data from an interim analysis for an observational, non comparative study (MIROIR study), which suggests the coherence of the results with those of the MM-003 pivotal study in terms of progression-free survival under IMNOVID in combination with dexamethasone,
  • the absence of comparative data versus the other treatments now available as third-line treatment,
  • the non transposability of the results of the MM-003 phase 3 trial and the MIROIR study to patients treated in accordance with current management due to the recent evolution in the care pathway for multiple myeloma, 
  • the partially met medical need in third-line treatment with the incorporation of new medicinal products,

the Transparency Committee considers that IMNOVID (pomalidomide) provides no clinical added value (CAV V) in the care pathway for relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma in combination with dexamethasone in adult patients who have received at least two prior treatment regimens, including both lenalidomide and bortezomib, and have demonstrated disease progression on the last therapy.


Contact Us

Évaluation des médicaments