Reason for request

First assessment

Key points

Favourable opinion for reimbursement only in the treatment of severe hypoglycaemia in adults, adolescents, and children aged 4 years and over with type 1 diabetes mellitus or insulin-treated type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Unfavourable opinion for reimbursement in the treatment of severe hypoglycaemia in adults, adolescents, and children aged 4 years and over with type 2 diabetes mellitus not treated by insulin.

What therapeutic improvement?

Therapeutic improvement compared to glucagon administered by injection in the treatment of severe hypoglycaemia in adults, adolescents, and children aged 4 years and over with type 1 diabetes mellitus or insulin-treated type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Role in the care pathway?

Severe hypoglycaemia, which has potentially life-threatening consequences, requires emergency treatment. The international guidelines (ADA, AACE) and those specialising in paediatrics (ISPAD) recommend the administration of glucagon for the management of severe hypoglycaemia in diabetic patients having lost consciousness or incapable of taking glucose orally. Glucagon can be administered by the intramuscular (IM) or subcutaneous (SC) route by the diabetic patient’s family, providing that they have been trained.

According to the Committee’s opinion relative to GLUCAGEN (glucagon), glucagon injection is contraindicated in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with sulfonylureas.

Role of the medicinal product in the care pathway

BAQSIMI (intranasal glucagon) is a first-line treatment in severe hypoglycaemic episodes in type 1 diabetes or insulin-treated type 2 diabetes.

Given its conditions of use, with a single nasal dose in ready-to-use packaging and storage at room temperature, BAQSIMI (intranasal glucagon) offers advantages compared to the injectable formulation of glucagon; in fact, the latter requires preparation of the injection, training of the patient’s family in administering the injection and storage of the medicinal product in the refrigerator before use.

As with injectable glucagon, the Committee recommends not using BAQSIMI (intranasal glucagon) in severe hypoglycaemic episodes in type 2 diabetes treated with sulfonylureas. Glucagon is one of the most potent insulin secretion stimulants. However, sulfonylureas induce insulin secretion by short-circuiting the insulin regulation and secretion steps by glucose. Insulin secretion persists on sulfonylurea treatment, irrespective of glucose levels. Consequently, the administration of glucagon when the hypoglycaemia is caused by a sulfonylurea could exacerbate the situation by increasing insulin secretion.

BAQSIMI (intranasal glucagon) has no role in the care pathway for type 2 diabetes not treated by insulin.


Clinical Benefit

Substantial

The Committee deems that the clinical benefit of BAQSIMI (intranasal glucagon) is substantial only in the treatment of severe hypoglycaemia in adults, adolescents, and children aged 4 years and over with type 1 diabetes mellitus or insulin-treated type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Insufficient

The Committee deems that the clinical benefit of BAQSIMI (intranasal glucagon) is insufficient to justify public funding cover in the treatment of severe hypoglycaemia in adults, adolescents, and children aged 4 years and over with type 2 diabetes mellitus not treated by insulin.

 


Clinical Added Value

minor

Considering:

  • demonstration of only the non-inferiority of intranasal glucagon compared to injectable glucagon, and only in adult patients with type 1 diabetes, on a composite primary endpoint, i.e., the percentage of patients achieving blood glucose ≥ 70 mg/dL and/or a blood glucose increase ≥ 20 mg/dL from glucose nadir, within 30 minutes after receiving glucagon, without receiving additional actions to increase the blood glucose level,
  • the available data in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes from a pharmacokinetic study, suggesting variable pharmacokinetics depending on age group, while remaining within acceptable limits,
  • the availability of only descriptive data in type 2 diabetes from a small sample of adult patients with insulin-treated type 2 diabetes assessed in the non-inferiority study,

but taking into account:

  • the medical need supported by healthcare professionals (expert opinion) and patient associations to have access to a glucagon administration route that is easier to use than the injectable route in order to improve treatment compliance, which is crucially important in this emergency situation,
  • the value of having access to an intranasal route to improve care conditions
  • and the known efficacy and safety profile of injectable glucagon in severe hypoglycaemia in type 1 diabetes and insulin-treated type 2 diabetes,

the Committee considers that BAQSIMI (intranasal glucagon) provides a minor clinical added value (CAV IV) compared to injectable glucagon in the treatment of severe hypoglycaemia in patients aged 4 years and over with type 1 diabetes mellitus or insulin-treated type 2 diabetes mellitus.

 

 

 


Contact Us

Évaluation des médicaments