AMELUZ (5-aminolevulinic acid) - Basal cell carcinomas
Reason for request
Summary of opinion
Favourable opinion for reimbursement only in the treatment of superficial basal cell carcinoma unsuitable for surgical treatment due to possible treatment-related morbidity and/or poor cosmetic outcome in adults.
Unfavourable opinion for reimbursement in the other clinical situations covered by the MA, in particular in the treatment of nodular basal cell carcinoma in adults.
Clinical Benefit
| Substantial |
The Committee deems that the clinical benefit of AMELUZ (5-aminolevulinic acid) 78 mg/g gel is substantial only in the treatment of superficial basal cell carcinoma unsuitable for surgical treatment due to possible treatment-related morbidity and/or poor cosmetic outcome in adults. |
| Insufficient |
The Committee deems that the clinical benefit of AMELUZ (5-aminolevulinic acid) 78 mg/g gel is insufficient to justify public funding in view of the available alternatives in the other clinical situations covered by the MA, in particular in the treatment of nodular basal cell carcinoma in adults. |
Clinical Added Value
| no clinical added value |
Considering:
the Committee deems that AMELUZ (5-aminolevulinic acid) 78 mg/g gel provides no clinical added value (CAV V) compared to METVIXIA (methyl aminolevulinate) in the treatment of superficial basal cell carcinoma unsuitable for surgical treatment due to possible treatment-related morbidity and/or poor cosmetic outcome in adults. |
