Reason for request

First listing

Summary of opinion

Favourable opinion for reimbursement in the treatment of adult patients with relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (RMS) with active disease defined by clinical or imaging features.


Clinical Benefit

Substantial

The Committee deems that the clinical benefit of BRIUMVI (ublituximab) is substantial in the MA indication.


Clinical Added Value

no clinical added value

Considering:

  • evidence of the superiority of ublituximab compared to teriflunomide, in two randomised, double-blind phase 3 studies in a selected population, with the majority of those included having early-stage relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) in terms of disease duration and inflammatory activity:
    • on the annualised relapse rate, the primary endpoint, with a clinically relevant reduction of 59.4% (RR = 0.406 95% CI: [0.268; 0.615], p<0.0001) in the ULTIMATE-I study and 49.1% (RR = 0.509 95% CI: [0.330; 0.784], p<0.002) in the ULTIMATE-II study;
    • on the total number of Gd-enhancing T1 lesions and the total number of new and/or enlarging T2 hyperintense lesions, ranked secondary endpoints,

but in view of:

  • the lack of evidence of a difference versus teriflunomide on the time to onset of disability
    progression, a clinically relevant third ranked secondary endpoint, while the other anti-CD20 antibodies authorised in this indication, OCREVUS (ocrelizumab) and KESIMPTA
    (ofatumumab), have demonstrated their superiority on this endpoint,
  • the absence of robust comparative data versus the available first-line alternatives, including the other anti-CD20 antibodies, rituximab, ocrelizumab and ofatumumab, the latter having been developed concomitantly,
  • the absence of robust data versus teriflunomide concerning quality of life in a disease that causes the progressive disability of patients,
  • the absence of long-term safety data (median follow-up of 95 weeks in the studies concerned), in particular concerning the long-term risk of hypogammaglobulinaemia,

the Transparency Committee deems that BRIUMVI (ublituximab) 150 mg concentrate for solution for infusion:

  • provides no clinical added value (CAV V) in the care pathway for patients with early-stage RRMS in terms of disease duration and inflammatory activity,
  • provides no clinical added value (CAV V) in the care pathway for patients with highly active or severe RMS.

Avis économique

Ce produit a fait l'objet d'un avis économique rendu par la Commission d'évaluation économique et de santé publique le 11 février 2025. L’avis économique porte sur l’indication ayant fait l’objet d’une demande d’amélioration du service médical rendu modérée (ASMR III), à savoir dans le traitement des patients atteints de SEP-RR à un stade précoce en termes de durée de la maladie et d’activité inflammatoire. La réserve méthodologique majeure, portant sur l’intégration d’un effet non-démontré du traitement évalué sur la progression du handicap invalide l’analyse coût-utilité et ses résultats.

Une analyse d’impact budgétaire a été fournie dans le cadre de ce dossier. Selon les choix et hypothèses de l’industriel retenus dans la modélisation, l’introduction de BRIUMVI (ublituximab) génère une augmentation des dépenses de l’Assurance Maladie d’environ 67 millions d’euros cumulés sur 5 ans, soit une hausse de 1,8%.

> BRIUMVI - avis économique (pdf)

 

Contact Us

Évaluation des médicaments