Reason for request
Indication extension
Summary of opinion
Favourable opinion for reimbursement in the following indication: “KEYTRUDA, in combination with chemoradiotherapy (external beam radiation therapy followed by brachytherapy), in the treatment of FIGO 2014 Stage III (extension onto the pelvic wall or lower one-third of the vagina and/or causing hydronephrosis or non-functioning kidney) to IVA (involvement of the mucosa of bladder/rectum -adjacent pelvic organ spread-) with or without involvement of the pelvic and/or para-aortic lymph nodes) locally advanced cervical cancer in adults who have not received prior definitive therapy.”
Clinical Benefit
| Substantial |
The Committee deems that the clinical benefit of KEYTRUDA (pembrolizumab), in combination with chemoradiotherapy (external beam radiation therapy followed by brachytherapy), is substantial in the indication: “in combination with chemoradiotherapy (external beam radiation therapy followed by brachytherapy), in the treatment of FIGO 2014 Stage III (extension onto the pelvic wall or lower one-third of the vagina and/or causing hydronephrosis or non-functioning kidney) to IVA (involvement of the mucosa of bladder/rectum -adjacent pelvic organ spread-) with or without involvement of the pelvic and/or para-aortic lymph nodes) locally advanced cervical cancer in adults who have not received prior definitive therapy.”
|
Clinical Added Value
| moderate |
Considering:
- demonstration in a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 study (KN-A18 trial, including 56.7% FIGO 2014 stage III - IVA patients) of the superiority of pembrolizumab compared to chemoradiotherapy, for the treatment of FIGO stage IB2-IIB and III - IVA locally advanced cervical cancer in adults who have not received prior definitive therapy, in terms of:
- progression-free survival with an HR = 0.70 (95% CI = [0.55; 0.89]; p = 0.002 < the predefined threshold of 0.0172), 7% patients progressed or died in the experimental group versus 29.0% patients in the control group. The median PFS was not reached in either of the two groups.
- overall survival with an HR = 0.67 (95% CI = [0.50; 0.90]; p = 0.0040 < 0.01026), 2% deaths in the experimental group versus 20.5% patients in the control group. The median OS was not reached in either of the two groups.
And despite:
- the absence of any formal conclusion that can be drawn based on the quality of life findings;
- a safety profile deemed to be acceptable compared to chemoradiotherapy but marked by an excess toxicity with grade ≥ 3 AEs reported in 78.3% of patients in the pembrolizumab group and 70.0% of patients in the placebo group). In addition, 20.6% of patients in the pembrolizumab group and 14.9% of patients in the placebo group had an AE resulting in definitive discontinuation of pembrolizumab treatment.
The Committee deems that KEYTRUDA (pembrolizumab) 25 mg/ml, concentrate for solution for infusion, in combination with chemoradiotherapy (external beam radiation therapy followed by brachytherapy), provides a moderate clinical added value (CAV III) compared to chemoradiotherapy.
|
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
6QZuK4Z1StuKu6uY